Abc 予想海外の反応 - ABC予想「証明は本当か？」欧米で論文に異議相次ぐ：朝日新聞デジタル

世界の数学者の理解を超越していた「ABC予想」査読にも困難をきわめた600ページの大論文(1/6)

Math Horizons September : 26—34. Heights in Diophantine Geometry. It seems bizarre to me that there would be an entire self-contained theory whose only external application is to prove conjecture after 300+ pages of set up, with no smaller fragment of this setup having any non-trivial external consequence whatsoever. This is obvious to any mathematician. Duke Mathematical Journal 108 1 : 169—181. Those proofs, by the way, are completely sound, very little seems to happen in those two papers to me. I agree with everything that was said. Journal of Number Theory 30 2 : 226—237. Research Notices 7 7 : 99—109. Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, IV. Diophantine, computational and algebraic aspects. The computer will not be able to make sense of this step either. The comparison to the Kepler conjecture, say, is entirely misguided: In that case, the general strategy was clear, but it was unclear whether every single case had been taken care of. This is in fact not the case; since shortly after the papers were out I am pointing out that I am entirely unable to follow the logic after Figure 3. The reason for this seems to be the difficulty of the paper. Proceedings of the international conference, Eger, Hungary, July 29-August 2, 1996. The Princeton Companion to Mathematics. It seems to me that having a shorter proof of concept e. Needless to say, the mathematical community was stagnant when the proof was first published in 2012, but today, after the paper was published, the reaction of mathematicians has been surprisingly cool. Proceedings of the Symposium on Analytic Number Theory. Graphs on Surfaces and Their Applications. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences 317 5 : 441—444. Coupled with his 65-page manuscript, containing plenty of arguments from authority, implicit ad-hominem attacks and appeals to herd behavior, the damage he is inflicting on his reputation by either refusing to accept that the proof is flawed or being able to provide valid counter-arguments is enormous, as Peter said. Inventiones Mathematicae 139: 509—523. It is in the proof of Corollary 3. In fact, one can hardly find any mention of it other than on this blog or. Since then, I have kept asking other experts about this step, and so far did not get any helpful explanation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. In fact, over the years more people came to the same conclusion; from everybody outside the immediate vicinity of Mochizuki, I heard that they did not understand that step either. Monatshefte für Mathematik 102 3 : 251—257. The ABC conjecture is a prediction about the relationship between addition and multiplication, and is known as the most important unsolved problem in number theory. Unsolved Problems in Number Theory. One small thing I would like to add is that accounts indicate that no experts have been able to point to a place where the proof would fail.。

Abc 予想 海外 の 反応 - ABC予想「証明は本当か？」 欧米で論文に異議相次ぐ：朝日新聞デジタル

世界の数学者の理解を超越していた「ABC予想」 査読にも困難をきわめた600ページの大論文(1/6)

abc予想 海外の反応がヤバイみたいですね。

世界の数学者の理解を超越していた「ABC予想」 査読にも困難をきわめた600ページの大論文(1/6)

[B!] ABC予想の査読検証の最新情報と海外の反応は？望月新一教授が証明！

宇宙際タイヒミュラー理論とショルツが指摘した欠陥とは？入門まとめ

2人のフィールズ賞学者が望月論文に抱いた違和感

abc予想 海外の反応がヤバイみたいですね。

Abc 予想海外の反応 - ABC予想「証明は本当か？」欧米で論文に異議相次ぐ：朝日新聞デジタル

世界の数学者の理解を超越していた「ABC予想」査読にも困難をきわめた600ページの大論文(1/6)

abc予想海外の反応がヤバイみたいですね。

世界の数学者の理解を超越していた「ABC予想」査読にも困難をきわめた600ページの大論文(1/6)

abc予想海外の反応がヤバイみたいですね。